top of page
Search

Supervision

Woodstock

It was a pleasure to host the supervision at home this time. What a fabulous working lunch we had. We talked about so much from:

  • the congruence between the Interest Theory of Rights what what I call Significant Events, based on Webster and Mertova’s notion of ‘critical events’ (2007, p.83)

  • literature supporting the correlation between well-being and rights (Casas, 2006; Lundy, 2014; UNICEF, 2017)

  • attachment, secondary attachments, and the importance of very young children's friendship bonds

  • Qualitative Content Analysis (QCA) versus Thematic Analysis (TA)

Chris wondered if you can have well-being without children’s rights? And, can you have children’s rights without well-being?

Refocusing on the central research question - what are the core concepts underpinning child rights pedagogy - I am at the moment exploring Article 3 in particular:

Article 3

1. In all actions concerning children … the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration

2. … ensure the child such protection and care as is necessary for his or her well-being …

3. … institutions, services and facilities responsible for the care or protection of children shall [ensure] the number and suitability of their staff …



0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Viva

All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. http://alinecolealbaeck.wix.com/rights-pedagogy makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. All information is provided on an as-is basis.

bottom of page